Watching the World Cup is always a thrilling experience, and it’s easy to get caught up in the excitement and drama of the competition. However, as I sat glued to the TV during the most recent tournament, I couldn’t help but feel that something was missing. As much as I enjoyed the intense battles between the world’s best teams, I couldn’t shake the feeling that the current system for determining the champion was flawed.
One of the biggest issues with the current system is the reliance on penalty kicks to decide the outcome of matches that end in a draw. While I understand that this is a fair way to determine a winner, it just doesn’t feel quite right. Penalty kicks are inherently unpredictable, and it feels like a bit of a letdown when a match that has been played with such intensity and skill is ultimately decided by a shootout.
Instead of relying on penalty kicks, I think it would be much more exciting if the World Cup adopted a “sudden death” overtime format. This would allow teams to continue playing until one of them scored a goal, creating a much more intense and dramatic finish to the match. With this format, teams would have to be on their toes at all times, as one mistake could be the difference between victory and defeat.
In addition to being more exciting, a sudden death overtime format would also be a more accurate representation of a team’s true ability. Penalty kicks are essentially a crapshoot, and it seems unfair that a team’s World Cup dreams could be ended by a single missed shot. With a sudden death format, teams would have the opportunity to showcase their skills and tactics over a longer period of time, making it a truer test of their abilities.
Overall, while the World Cup is always a thrilling event, I believe that it could be made even better with a few changes to the current system. By moving away from penalty kicks and embracing a sudden death overtime format, we could create a more exciting and fair competition for the world’s best teams.